Every attack follows a path.Find where it can be stopped.
Falkens Maze is a method in development for tracing how a harmful or unauthorised action could happen — through which channels, on whose apparent authority — and identifying the checkpoints where it can be interrupted.
Interactive fictional scenarios only. No live detection, uploads, or security decisions.

I — Why it matters
The message can be genuine. The action can still be wrong.
A supplier's real mailbox asks for new bank details. An AI assistant receives an instruction that looks routine. The communication may be authentic, while the resulting action — a payment, a disclosure, an automated step — is not authorised. Inspecting the message alone cannot settle that.
Common focus
Detect the message
Is this email, file or prompt suspicious? Valuable, but it fails quietly when the source itself is real or compromised.
Falkens Maze focus
Control the action
What would this request cause, and which independent check must hold before it can happen?
II — The Method
Three disciplined steps.
01
Trace
Map the conditions, dependencies and trust relationships an action relies on.
Follow the route from first contact to consequence.
02
Interrupt
Locate the human and system gates where the route can be stopped.
Prefer checks that are independent of the requesting channel.
03
Verify
Assess the evidence that each check was actually completed.
Record who confirmed what, through which channel, and when.
A signed-off checkpoint is evidence that a process was followed — not a guarantee of safety.
III — Worked example
Walk one pathway.
A payment-detail change, traced from first contact to consequence, with an independent verification gate at the point of action.
Illustrative model — not a live scan
Supplier payment-detail change
Stage 04 · checkpoint
The path is interrupted
Pathway interrupted here
Before the change is applied, it must be confirmed through a channel the requester does not control: a known phone number, a second approver, or a system-held reference. The pathway stops here until the check is complete.
Reviewer's question
Is the verification independent of the channel that made the request?
The interactive laboratory
See how the evidence changes the assessment.
Explore fictional payment, information-release, and AI-agent scenarios. Examine verification checkpoints and synthetic source attestations. This is an educational demonstration, not a live cybersecurity check.
IV — Applications
Where the method is aimed first.
Planned application areas
- AREA APlanned
Payment diversion
Changes to supplier or payee details that redirect legitimate funds.
- AREA BPlanned
Sensitive information release
Requests that lead to disclosure of personal, commercial or official records.
- AREA CPlanned
AI agent actions
Instructions that cause an automated agent to act beyond its intended authority.
V — Development status
Building the foundation.
Falkens Maze is in development. The interactive Maze Lab now demonstrates fictional threat pathways and signed test attestations in your browser. It cannot authenticate real-world evidence, authorise actions or block attacks. There is no login, file upload or live threat scanning.
- Methodology
- Defined
- Synthetic Maze Lab
- Available to explore
- Signed test evidence
- Synthetic only
- Live security enforcement
- Not implemented
Security and privacy by design: any future architecture will define its data boundaries before it handles sensitive material.
